Ricardo Mariano Gonzalez examines how technology concentration risk is emerging as one of the most significant operational resilience challenges facing financial institutions. He argues that while firms have improved oversight of individual third parties,
For years, organizations have focused on the risks associated with
individual
technology providers. Yet according to Ricardo Mariano Gonzalez, former
Executive Director of Operational Resilience, Technology Risk and Third-Party
Governance at Zurich Insurance Company Ltd, that perspective is no longer
sufficient.
The greater danger may lie not in any single provider, but in the growing
number of organizations that have become dependent on the same providers,
platforms, and infrastructure.
Speaking ahead of Next Gen OpRisk Europe 2026 in October, Gonzalez argues
that systemic technology concentration risk has evolved into a board-level
concern that demands far greater attention from senior leaders.
As firms pursue efficiency, scalability, and innovation, many have
independently arrived at similar technology decisions. While those choices
often make sense
individually, collectively they can create vulnerabilities that stretch
far beyond a single organization.
“What I have observed in practice is that this shift becomes visible at Board
level not when a provider fails, but when an organisation realises that the
same disruption could affect many of its peers simultaneously,” he explains.
The implications are significant. Financial institutions have become increasingly
sophisticated in understanding their direct technology relationships, but
Gonzalez believes the real challenge now lies in understanding where
dependencies converge across industries and critical infrastructure ecosystems.
“The issue is no longer whether an organisation understands its own technology
dependencies,” he says. “The challenge is understanding where those
dependencies converge across an industry, a market or a critical infrastructure
ecosystem.”
This evolution has been reflected in recent regulatory developments. Having
led DORA implementation across two regulated entities operating under different
supervisory regimes, Gonzalez has witnessed a growing focus on ICT
concentration risk as a resilience and governance issue rather than a purely
technical concern.
As a result, technology concentration has moved beyond the traditional domains
of procurement, outsourcing, and technology risk.
Boards are increasingly expected to understand how disruption at a shared
provider could affect multiple firms simultaneously, potentially creating
market-wide consequences.
One reason this challenge has become so difficult is the complexity of
modern technology ecosystems. Most organizations have improved their oversight
of critical third parties, but dependencies rarely stop at the contractual
boundary.
“A financial institution may know which cloud provider it uses, which software
vendors support critical services, and which outsourcing partners deliver key
capabilities,” Ricardo notes. “What is often less visible are the layers of
dependency that sit behind them.”
Cloud providers rely on other providers. Software platforms depend on
shared infrastructure. Critical services may ultimately be linked through
common data centers, telecommunications networks, or specialist suppliers.