Skip to content

Content Library

Back to Articles

Article October 11, 2025

Securitization Surges As Basel IV Punishes Low Risk Assets

Securitization Surges As Basel IV Punishes Low Risk Assets

Thea Holland, Conference Producer

The head of quantitative structuring at a leading European bank warned delegates at a CeFPro conference earlier this year that Basel IV’s output floor is inflating risk weights on low risk portfolios and squeezing returns. Banks are turning to securitizat

Basel IV is reshaping balance sheets in ways few lenders can ignore, according to the head of quantitative structuring at a leading European bank, who told a treasury session at CerFPro’s flagship Risk Evolve conference earlier this year that regulators are squeezing returns on low risk portfolios.

The speaker told delegates Basel IV framework’s output floor is lifting risk weighted assets on categories once considered ultra safe - from specialized lending to prime mortgages in low default jurisdictions - with profitability falling below water in some scenarios as required margins jump after the floor bites 

His message was stark. When low internal risk weights are dragged up toward standardized levels over a five year glidepath to 72.5 percent, transactions that once cleared hurdle rates may no longer do so. 

The result is a renewed push to securitization as a capital and liquidity tool - not as regulatory arbitrage, the speaker stressed, but as balance sheet rotation to restore returns while keeping risk transfer transparent and measurable 

In practice, assets are pooled into a bankruptcy remote vehicle that issues layered liabilities - equity, mezzanine, and super senior - with banks selling tranches to redistribute risk and funding costs. 

By retaining the slice where economics are richest and offloading first loss and super senior, institutions can cut exposure from 100 to roughly 22 units while lifting profitability, then reinvest freed capacity into new production. 

Do it again, and capital velocity compounds 

The executive argued that mechanics matter. Cash deals bring true-sale structuring, liquidity reserves, servicing waterfalls, and rating constraints that push most credit risk into junior pieces, while synthetic deals use guarantees to transfer credit risk off balance sheet without moving assets in accounting. 

Significant risk transfer recognition is now predominantly won via synthetic formats, he added, reflecting recent European rule changes and market practice. 

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Sign up

Connect Plus

Unlock more with Connect Plus membership

This content is available to Connect Plus members.